BetConstruct vs Digitain 2026: Which Armenian Giant Fits Your Operation

• BetConstruct is a vertically integrated full-stack platform covering sportsbook, casino, payments, and data through a single vendor -- best for operators who want one relationship across multiple products.
• Digitain is a sportsbook-first platform with 800+ market types and modular architecture -- best for operators who want depth in sports markets and the freedom to choose their own casino and payment partners.
• BetConstruct has stronger infrastructure in Africa and Latin America; Digitain leads for rapid white-label launches in CIS and Central/Eastern Europe.
• Don't compare headline pricing -- build a 24-month total cost of ownership model including setup fees, revenue share, minimum commitments, and payment processing costs to see the real spread.

Two of the most significant B2B iGaming platforms in the world share the same city of origin -- Yerevan, Armenia. BetConstruct and Digitain have both built substantial businesses powering operators across CIS, Africa, Latin America, and parts of Asia, yet they've taken meaningfully different paths to get there. One built everything in-house, from sportsbook to payment gateway. The other went deep on sports-first and grew outward through partnerships.

If you're evaluating both -- and if you're targeting tier-2 or tier-3 markets, you probably should be -- the differences matter more than the similarities. This isn't a "who's better" article. It's a breakdown of where each platform excels, where the trade-offs sit, and which operator profiles match which provider.

For the broader framework on evaluating platform providers, start with our platform selection guide. If you're still deciding between white-label and turnkey models, this comparison covers the structural trade-offs.

1. Company Profiles: Different DNA

BetConstruct operates as a vertically integrated platform company. Founded in Yerevan, the company reportedly employs approximately 3,000 people and maintains offices across Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Their SpringBME platform covers the full stack: sportsbook, casino, poker, fantasy sports, esports, and even a proprietary payment gateway. They also own FeedConstruct, their sports data and live streaming operation, which feeds directly into their sportsbook product.

With 400+ reported operator partners as of 2025, BetConstruct has one of the largest B2B footprints in the industry outside of the European majors. The company's approach has been to build rather than buy -- a strategy that gives them control over the full operator experience but also means they carry significant engineering overhead.

Digitain started with a narrower focus. Also founded in Yerevan, with a London-based commercial office, Digitain built its reputation as a sportsbook-first platform. Their pre-match and in-play product covers approximately 800+ sports markets, which puts them in the upper tier globally for depth of coverage. The company has expanded into casino through partnerships rather than building proprietary content, and serves 100+ operators -- predominantly through white-label and turnkey arrangements.

The difference in approach is fundamental: BetConstruct owns the entire value chain. Digitain focuses on doing sportsbook exceptionally well and partners for everything else.

2. Sportsbook Comparison

Both companies are genuinely strong in sportsbook, but the product architectures diverge in important ways.

BetConstruct's sportsbook is built on proprietary data infrastructure through FeedConstruct. This vertical integration means their odds compilation, live data, and streaming all come from the same system. The practical benefit: lower latency between data events and odds updates, and tighter control over margin management. BetConstruct offers approximately 400,000+ pre-match events annually and covers 100+ sports. Their live betting product supports real-time cash-out, bet builder, and multi-market parlays.

The downside of the integrated model is flexibility. If you want to mix BetConstruct's sportsbook with a third-party odds feed -- perhaps for a sport where another provider has better coverage -- the integration path is more complex than it would be with a modular provider.

Digitain's sportsbook has historically been the company's core product and it shows. Coverage spans 800+ betting markets across 65+ sports, with particular depth in football, basketball, cricket, and esports. Digitain uses a combination of proprietary trading tools and third-party data feeds, which gives their operators flexibility to optimize coverage by sport and geography.

Where Digitain often edges ahead is in customization of the betting experience. Their back-office tools let operators configure market layouts, risk parameters, and bonus mechanics at a granular level -- important for operators targeting specific regional preferences. Bet acceptance speed and in-play latency have been areas of consistent investment over the past two years.

3. Casino and Content Strategy

This is where the two diverge most sharply.

BetConstruct offers a proprietary casino solution alongside third-party integrations. Their in-house games division has produced a growing catalogue, and they integrate major studios through their content aggregation layer. The pitch: one contract, one integration, access to sportsbook and casino together. For operators who don't want to manage multiple vendor relationships, this reduces complexity.

The trade-off is volume and exclusivity. BetConstruct's aggregated casino library is solid but typically smaller than what a dedicated aggregator like SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix can offer. If your strategy relies on having 8,000+ games from 150 studios, you'll likely need to supplement BetConstruct's casino offering with additional integrations -- which partially negates the "one vendor" advantage.

Digitain took a different path entirely. Rather than building a casino product in-house, they've established partnerships with major game aggregators and content providers. This means operators get casino through proven aggregation partners while running Digitain's sportsbook as the core product. The approach works well for sportsbook-led operations that treat casino as a secondary revenue stream.

The limitation: casino quality and breadth depend on Digitain's integration partners rather than their own product development. Operators who want deep casino customization -- bespoke game lobbies, proprietary bonus engines tied to specific slots -- may find more friction than they would with a casino-first platform.

4. Technology Stack and API Quality

BetConstruct's SpringBME is a full-featured platform that handles everything from player management and CRM to risk management and payment processing. The API layer is mature -- it has to be, given the number of operator integrations they support -- and documentation is generally adequate for experienced integration teams. REST and WebSocket APIs cover the major use cases.

The platform supports multi-brand architecture, allowing operators to run several brands from a single back-office. This is particularly relevant for operators holding multiple licenses or targeting different demographics within the same market.

One area where BetConstruct has invested heavily is their payment gateway. Having payments in-house means operators can process deposits and withdrawals through the same platform that manages their gaming -- reducing reconciliation complexity and potentially improving success rates through unified fraud detection.

Digitain's technology is built around modular deployment. Their platform architecture allows operators to adopt the sportsbook independently or as part of a broader stack. API documentation is structured for white-label deployment, with emphasis on front-end customization and third-party integration points.

Digitain's back-office is focused on sportsbook operations: trader tools, risk management dashboards, and real-time performance analytics. The interface is purpose-built for sports trading teams rather than being a general-purpose platform management tool.

5. Geographic Strengths

Both companies have deep roots in CIS markets, but their expansion trajectories differ.

BetConstruct has established significant presence across Africa, Latin America, and parts of Asia in addition to its CIS base. Their local regulatory expertise in markets like Nigeria, Kenya, Colombia, and Brazil has been a differentiator for operators entering these regions. The company holds multiple operator licenses and has local payment integrations across approximately 30+ jurisdictions.

Their African footprint is particularly notable. BetConstruct has invested in local infrastructure and partnerships across West and East Africa, providing retail (bet shop) solutions alongside online platforms -- a dual-channel approach that matches how betting markets actually function in many African countries.

Digitain is strongest in CIS, Central and Eastern Europe, and select Asian markets. Their white-label model has gained traction in tier-2 and tier-3 markets where operators want to launch quickly without building technology infrastructure. Digitain's focus on rapid deployment -- they cite launch timelines as short as a few weeks for white-label setups -- appeals to operators who prioritize speed to market over full customization.

In Latin America, Digitain's presence is growing but less established than BetConstruct's. For operators targeting LATAM specifically, BetConstruct's existing integrations with local payment methods and regulatory relationships represent a meaningful head start.

6. Pricing and Commercial Models

Neither company publishes fixed pricing -- like most B2B iGaming providers, commercial terms are negotiated per deal. However, the general structures differ.

BetConstruct typically operates on revenue-share models combined with setup fees. The integrated nature of their platform means operators often pay a single revenue share that covers sportsbook, casino, and payments. Minimum monthly fees apply in most cases, which can be a barrier for very small operators or those in early launch phases. The all-in-one pricing model can be cost-effective at scale, where the single-vendor overhead savings offset what might be a slightly higher headline rate than assembling a multi-vendor stack.

Digitain positions more aggressively on white-label pricing for tier-2 and tier-3 markets. Their commercial model emphasizes lower barriers to entry -- competitive setup fees and revenue-share structures designed for operators at earlier stages of growth. For sportsbook-only deals, the pricing is typically straightforward: a GGR percentage with sliding scales based on volume.

The key comparison point isn't headline pricing -- it's total cost of ownership over 24 months. An operator running sportsbook + casino + payments through BetConstruct's integrated platform may spend less in aggregate than an operator assembling Digitain's sportsbook with separate casino and payment vendors, even if individual line items look cheaper.

7. Compliance and Licensing Support

Both companies offer compliance support, but the depth varies by market.

BetConstruct holds its own B2B licenses in several jurisdictions and provides compliance consulting as part of its operator onboarding. Their experience in markets like Curacao, Malta (through partnerships), Isle of Man, and multiple African jurisdictions gives them a practical advantage for operators navigating unfamiliar regulatory environments. The integrated payment gateway also simplifies compliance around AML and KYC, since player verification and transaction monitoring sit within the same system.

Digitain maintains B2B certifications and supports operators through the licensing process in their core markets. Their white-label model includes compliance infrastructure -- responsible gambling tools, self-exclusion mechanisms, and reporting templates -- as standard components. For operators launching in regulated European markets, Digitain's London office provides proximity to UK and European regulatory frameworks.

8. Head-to-Head Comparison Table

9. Which One Fits Your Operation

The choice isn't about which company is "better" -- it's about which architecture matches your operational model.

Choose BetConstruct if:

• You want a single-vendor relationship covering sportsbook, casino, payments, and data
• You're entering African or Latin American markets where BetConstruct has established infrastructure
• Retail/bet shop capability is part of your strategy
• You have the budget for a full-stack deployment and want to minimize third-party dependencies
• Your operation will span multiple products from day one

Choose Digitain if:

• Sportsbook is your primary product and you want maximum depth in sports markets
• Speed to market is critical and you prefer a white-label launch
• You want flexibility to select your own casino aggregator and payment providers
• You're targeting tier-2/3 markets with competitive pricing requirements
• Your team prefers modular architecture where you can swap components as you scale

Consider both if:

You're in the RFP stage and your market is CIS, Central/Eastern Europe, or parts of Asia where both providers have strong track records. Run parallel sandbox evaluations. The practical differences in API quality, support responsiveness, and trader tooling won't show up in pitch decks -- they show up in testing.

For a broader view of how to structure a sportsbook launch, including technology selection, licensing, and content strategy, that guide covers the process end to end.