Delasport vs Pronet Gaming: Which Turnkey Fits

The verdict first. Take Pronet Gaming if your markets are in Africa or Latin America, mobile money is a first-class payment rail rather than an afterthought, and you want a supplier that publishes a launch window and an uptime commitment you can hold it to. Take Delasport if you are heading into regulated Europe or Ontario, you want a managed sportsbook rather than a self-service one, and you are prepared to do your own diligence on the operational numbers its public material does not carry.

That last clause is the real subject of this comparison. Both are turnkey suppliers of roughly similar standing in the iGamingHub catalog, at 71 and 68 out of 100. What separates them on paper is not capability, it is how much either one is willing to state in public.

What each card documents

Read the "not documented" rows as what they are. They do not mean Delasport has no payment integrations or cannot tell you when you would go live. They mean the answer is not on its public material, so it has to come out of a call — and until it does, you cannot compare the two on that axis at all. The iGamingHub catalog records what a supplier states, which is why half of this table is a shape rather than a number.

Where Pronet Gaming is the stronger answer

Its stated position is narrow and it commits to it: an Africa-first platform built around deep localisation for mobile money payments. That is not a line you write unless you have done the integration work, and it lines up with the rest of the card — 160 payment methods, 30 languages, Africa and LatAm as declared markets.

For an operator entering Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya or Tanzania, that is the difference between a platform and a project. Mobile money is not a payment method you bolt on; it is a different settlement model with its own reconciliation, its own failure modes and its own customer support load. A supplier that has already carried it is worth more than a broader stack that has not.

The card also carries the two things an operator can hold a vendor to: a launch window of 6 to 14 weeks and a 99.9% uptime SLA. Neither is remarkable on its own. Both are contractual anchors, and their absence on the other side of this table is the practical gap.

Pronet has been visible on the trade circuit, enhancing its market positioning at ICE Barcelona 2026 and taking an SCBPO accreditation in the Philippines in late 2025, which suggests the emerging-market focus extends past Africa. Treat the accreditation as a signal about direction, not as a licence covering your market.

The weak spot is the licence list. Two entries, recorded as SPA and NGC, neither expanded in the vendor's own material — and a supplier's licence list is the one field where an unexpanded acronym is a problem, because you cannot check a register you cannot name. Ask which regulator issued each, ask for the number, and check it before it matters.

Where Delasport is the stronger answer

Three licences: MGA, Isle of Man and Ontario. That is a regulated-market posture, and Ontario in particular is not a jurisdiction a supplier drifts into. Getting registered there means passing AGCO's process and operating under an iGaming Ontario agreement, which is covered in the Ontario market analysis. Of the 44 platform providers iGamingHub tracks, six record an Ontario entry; Delasport is one of them.

That matters if your roadmap points at regulated Europe or Canada rather than emerging markets, because the licence is where the cost sits. On a turnkey deal you hold the operating licence yourself, but the platform still has to be certified against the regulator's technical standards, and a supplier that has already been through it in your market saves you a certification cycle. The white label and turnkey comparison sets out where that obligation lands in each model.

On product, Delasport carries crash games where Pronet does not — a category that matters disproportionately in LatAm and parts of Africa, and one the vendor has been building on, launching its own crash title in early 2026. It has also been pushing into Canada, consistent with the Ontario entry on its card.

The gap is everything the card does not say. No launch window, no SLA, no payment method count, no language count, no stated markets. For a managed-service supplier that is a meaningful omission, because managed service is exactly where those numbers describe the product. It is recoverable — ask, and get the answers in the contract — but it means the shortlist call has to do work that the website should have done.

What to ask on the shortlist call

Both cards leave questions open, and they are not the same questions, so a single generic RFP will not close them.

For Delasport, the four gaps are commercial rather than technical: what is the realistic go-live window for your specific licence and market, what uptime figure will it put in the contract, how many payment providers are already integrated for the countries you named, and what does the managed service actually include once the platform is live. Ask for the window in weeks from contract signature rather than from technical kick-off — the difference between the two is often a month of licence and acquirer work that nobody counts.

For Pronet Gaming, the questions are regulatory. Get the issuing authority and the number behind each of the two licence entries, then check them yourself. Ask which mobile money operators are live rather than integrated, because the two words describe different states, and settlement in this segment is where the difference shows. And confirm whether the 6-week end of the launch range assumes an existing licence in hand.

For both, ask who carries the certification burden in each market you plan to enter. On a turnkey deal the operating licence is yours, but the platform still needs technical approval in most regulated jurisdictions, and a supplier that has been through it already removes a cycle from your timeline. That question separates a vendor that has done the work from one that has done the slide.

The axis that actually decides it

Neither platform wins on features. They are close on content volume, identical on commercial model, and both certified for RNG. The decision comes down to two questions in sequence.

Which market are you entering? Africa and LatAm point at Pronet Gaming, because localisation there is the product rather than a feature list. Regulated Europe and Ontario point at Delasport, because its licence record is the one that matches.

How much undocumented ground can you absorb? An operator with a compliance function and time to run a procurement process can close Delasport's information gap in two calls. A small team launching on a deadline cannot, and for them a supplier that publishes a launch window and an SLA is worth more than one with a better licence list.

If both shortlists feel thin, BetConstruct sits in the same bracket with a fuller card, and the platform selection guide has the wider criteria list.

Choose Delasport if

Your markets are regulated Europe or Ontario and you want a supplier already certified there; you want a managed sportsbook with crash content included; and you have the procurement capacity to extract launch timing, payment coverage and SLA terms in negotiation rather than reading them off a page. See the Delasport card for the current data.

Choose Pronet Gaming if

Your growth is in Africa or LatAm and mobile money is central to your cashier; you want the commercial anchors — a 6 to 14 week window and a 99.9% SLA — written down before you sign; or you need crypto and an API-first stack, neither of which the other card records. See the Pronet Gaming card, and settle the licence question early: two unexpanded entries need names and numbers before they mean anything.

Methodology and sources

Platform facts — licences, content volume, payment and language counts, launch window, uptime SLA, revenue model, stated markets and feature flags — come from the iGamingHub platform catalog as of September 2026, which records what each supplier states publicly. A field marked "not documented" means the supplier does not publish it, not that the capability is absent. Match ratings are calculated from data completeness and capability, and a supplier that publishes less scores lower for that reason alone.

Company developments are cited from the trade press pieces linked above. Licence entries are as recorded on the card; verify current status on the issuing regulator's own register before contracting, because a supplier's site is often months behind its own position.