Pariplay vs Hub88 2026: Which Aggregator Wins

• Pariplay carries 10,000+ titles through its Fusion hub and adds a heavy value-added layer -- gamification, tournaments, network promos -- on top of an Aspire Global enterprise/white-label backbone. Strongest for Tier 1 regulated brands.
• Hub88 carries 12,000+ games from 150+ providers through one unified API (Hub88 Connect), positioned for very fast integration. Holds MGA and Curacao licences and runs across Europe, LatAm, and Asia.
• Crypto: Hub88 supports Bitcoin, USDT, and Ethereum alongside fiat. Pariplay is the fiat-and-regulated-rails choice.
• Commercial model: Hub88 runs revenue share with ~4-10 week launches, 24/7 support, a dedicated manager, and ~99.9% uptime. Pariplay is an enterprise engagement where the value-added services are the pitch, not just the game count.
• Short version: Pick Pariplay for Tier 1 regulation plus promo tooling. Pick Hub88 for fast, multi-region, crypto-friendly distribution on revenue share.

Both Pariplay and Hub88 do the same headline job: they hand you a single connection and, behind it, thousands of games from dozens of studios. Plug in once, and you skip the misery of negotiating and integrating each provider one by one. On that level they look interchangeable. They're not.

Pariplay and Hub88 are built for different operators. Pariplay reads as a regulated-markets aggregator with an enterprise white-label backbone and a thick layer of value-added tools sitting on top of the games. Hub88 reads as a fast, API-first distribution platform that's happy in multiple regions, comfortable with crypto, and priced on revenue share. One is a heavier, services-rich partner aimed at Tier 1 regulated brands. The other is a lean pipe built to get games live quickly across Europe, LatAm, and Asia.

So the real question isn't "which aggregator has more games" -- both carry more than you'll ever surface to players. It's "which one matches where you operate, how fast you need to launch, and how much extra machinery you want bolted on." This guide breaks the choice down across regulatory footprint, integration speed, catalogue versus tooling, commercial model, and who each one actually suits.

The 30-second comparison

Here's the head-to-head across the dimensions that actually decide the contract. Read it, then dig into the sections that matter to your case.

Both are legitimate aggregators. The table just makes the split obvious: Pariplay sells you a regulated platform with promo machinery attached, Hub88 sells you a fast, wide pipe with crypto and multi-region reach. For the wider category and how aggregators price and integrate in general, our game aggregator comparison 2026 sets the baseline.

Pariplay: the regulated-markets platform with tools attached

Pariplay is a game aggregation and white-label casino platform. Its Fusion hub carries 10,000+ titles, but the catalogue is only half the story. The other half is the value-added services layer -- gamification mechanics, tournaments, and network-wide promotional tools -- that sits on top of the games and gives operators ways to drive engagement without building that machinery in-house.

The backbone matters here. Pariplay is backed by Aspire Global infrastructure, part of the NeoGames/Aspire group. That's an enterprise-grade platform lineage, not a startup stack, and it shows up in two ways. First, in the regulated-markets posture: Pariplay is strong in Tier 1 jurisdictions where compliance, certification, and per-market game builds aren't optional. Second, in the white-label backbone -- if you want more than an aggregation feed, Pariplay can sit under a broader platform relationship rather than being a bolt-on pipe.

So who's this for? Operators who live in regulated markets and want their aggregator to do more than pass games through. If you're running a licensed brand in a Tier 1 market and you want tournaments, jackpots-style network promos, and gamification you don't have to build yourself, Pariplay's pitch lines up. The trade-off is that this is an enterprise engagement. You're buying into a platform relationship and a services layer, which is exactly right for some operators and heavier than others need. The verified specs sit on our Pariplay provider page.

A few things Pariplay does well for its target buyer:

1. Value-added services out of the box -- gamification, tournaments, and network promos that would otherwise be a separate build or a separate vendor.
2. Tier 1 regulatory alignment -- built for markets where certification and per-jurisdiction compliance are the price of entry.
3. Enterprise backbone -- Aspire Global infrastructure and a white-label option for operators who want a platform relationship, not just a feed.

Note this article doesn't link a Pariplay profile page -- that listing isn't live on iGamingHub yet. Judge Pariplay on the verified facts here and the vendor's own certification documentation.

Hub88: the fast, wide, crypto-friendly pipe

Hub88 is a game aggregation and distribution platform, founded in 2018. It carries 12,000+ games from 150+ providers, all reachable through one unified API -- Hub88 Connect -- that the company positions around very fast integration. That single-API framing is the whole point: connect once, and the catalogue is available without wiring up providers individually.

The regulatory and market posture is different from Pariplay's. Hub88 holds MGA and Curacao licences and runs across Europe, LatAm, and Asia. That combination -- one Tier 1 licence (MGA) plus Curacao plus a multi-region reach -- signals an aggregator comfortable in both regulated and emerging markets. On verticals it covers casino, live casino, and crash games, so the fast-growing crash category is native rather than an afterthought. Live and crash-style content sits inside an online gambling market that Statista tracks in the tens of billions of dollars a year, so native coverage of those verticals isn't a small detail.

Then there's crypto. Hub88 supports Bitcoin, USDT, and Ethereum alongside fiat, which is a genuine differentiator if your player base transacts in crypto or you're targeting markets where crypto rails are normal. It runs around 15 languages, which fits the multi-region reach.

Commercially, Hub88 is built to move. The model is revenue share. Launch runs roughly 4-10 weeks. You get 24/7 support, a dedicated account manager, and a stated ~99.9% uptime SLA. That's a package aimed at operators who want to get live fast, spread across regions, without an enterprise-scale onboarding.

What Hub88 leans on:

• One unified API (Hub88 Connect) built for speed -- the integration is the selling point.
• Multi-region reach across Europe, LatAm, and Asia under MGA + Curacao licensing.
• Crypto plus fiat -- Bitcoin, USDT, Ethereum, and ~15 languages for a genuinely international rollout.
• Revenue-share commercials with ~4-10 week launches and a ~99.9% uptime SLA.

If you want to check the details yourself, we keep a Hub88 provider profile with the verified facts. For how a revenue-share arrangement actually works against fixed fees, the revenue share glossary entry is worth two minutes.

Regulatory footprint: Tier 1 focus vs multi-region reach

This is the cleanest split between the two. Pariplay's strength is Tier 1 regulated markets -- the jurisdictions with the strictest certification and the highest compliance bar. If your brand lives there, an aggregator that's built for that scrutiny is worth more than one carrying a few thousand extra titles. The Malta Gaming Authority's licensee and compliance framework gives a sense of what Tier 1 actually demands from the tech behind a brand.

Hub88's footprint is wider and flatter. MGA gives it a Tier 1 credential, Curacao gives it emerging-market reach, and the stated markets -- Europe, LatAm, Asia -- match that. For context on the lighter-touch end, Curacao's Gaming Control Board framework is where a lot of multi-region and crypto-forward operators land. So if you're launching across several regions, or you want a single aggregator that works in both regulated and emerging markets, Hub88's licensing mix fits better than a pure Tier 1 focus.

Neither licence, though, is your licence. Read the FAQ below -- you still need your own.

Integration speed: both fast, one faster on paper

Both platforms are aggregators, so both save you the per-provider integration grind. The difference is how each frames the connection.

Hub88 makes integration speed an explicit selling point. Hub88 Connect is one unified API, and the pitch is very fast integration with a ~4-10 week launch window. That's a concrete, quotable number. If time-to-market is the constraint -- you've got a licence, you want games live this quarter -- that clarity is worth a lot.

Pariplay's Fusion hub is also a single integration point, and the Aspire Global backbone means it's enterprise-proven. But Pariplay's onboarding tends to come with the value-added services and platform relationship, which is a richer engagement than a straight feed. That's not slower by definition -- it's just more than a pipe. If all you need is games in fast, Hub88's model is the more direct route. If you're onboarding a platform plus a promo toolkit, Pariplay's timeline reflects the extra scope.

Catalogue vs tooling: more games or more machinery

Here's the honest framing. Hub88 carries more raw games -- 12,000+ from 150+ providers versus Pariplay's 10,000+ -- but that gap is close to meaningless in practice. No operator surfaces 12,000 titles to players. Once you're past a few thousand quality games, catalogue size stops being a differentiator and studio mix, certification, and per-market availability take over. Raw counts are marketing metrics, not quality signals. Ask both for the studio list and per-jurisdiction availability that actually matters to your markets.

Where they genuinely diverge is the layer above the games. Pariplay's value-added services -- gamification, tournaments, network promos -- are the real pitch. That's engagement machinery you'd otherwise build or buy separately. Hub88 stays lean: it's distribution-first, with the crash and live verticals native, but it isn't selling you a promo toolkit. It's selling you a wide, fast, well-supported pipe.

So the trade isn't "more games vs fewer games." It's "more tools vs a leaner pipe." If retention mechanics and network promos are on your roadmap and you'd rather not build them, Pariplay's layer earns its keep. If you've got your own CRM and engagement stack and just need games flowing across regions, Hub88's leanness is a feature, not a gap. The same tension shows up in platform choices generally -- see SoftSwiss vs EveryMatrix 2026 for how tooling depth plays out at the full-platform level.

Commercial model: revenue share vs enterprise engagement

Hub88 is explicit: revenue share. You pay as a cut of what the games generate, launch runs ~4-10 weeks, and the package includes 24/7 support, a dedicated manager, and a ~99.9% uptime SLA. That's a clean, predictable structure that scales with your revenue rather than hitting you with heavy fixed costs up front. It suits operators who want commercial terms that track performance.

Pariplay is an enterprise/white-label engagement. The commercial shape follows from that -- you're buying into a platform and a services layer backed by Aspire Global, not just metering game revenue. For a Tier 1 brand that wants the promo tooling and the enterprise backbone, that's the right kind of relationship. For a lean operator watching fixed costs, it's more than the job needs. Neither model is better in the abstract; they're priced for different buyers. If white-label structures are new to you, the white-label casino glossary entry explains what that backbone actually includes.

Which one fits you

No universal winner here. The right pick falls out of where you operate and what you want your aggregator to do beyond passing games through.

• Choose Pariplay if -- you run a licensed brand in Tier 1 regulated markets, you want value-added tools (gamification, tournaments, network promos) without building them yourself, and an enterprise white-label backbone from the Aspire/NeoGames group is an asset rather than overkill. You're buying a platform relationship, not just a feed.
• Choose Hub88 if -- you want fast integration through one unified API, you're launching or already live across Europe, LatAm, and Asia, you need crypto support (Bitcoin, USDT, Ethereum) alongside fiat, and revenue-share commercials with a ~4-10 week launch and ~99.9% uptime SLA fit how you want to run. You're buying a fast, wide, well-supported pipe.
• Consider looking wider if -- your priority is a full platform (PAM, back office, payments) rather than an aggregation feed. In that case, start with how to choose a platform provider and our modular PAM systems 2026 breakdown before committing to any aggregator, because the aggregator is one layer of a bigger stack.

One honest note: these two aren't mutually exclusive. Some operators run more than one aggregator to cover gaps in studio mix or regional content. If you do, watch the overhead -- two integrations, two reconciliations, two support lines -- and make sure the extra coverage earns the complexity.