Game Aggregator Reach: What 66 Studios Name on Their Sites

Fifty of the 66 game studios in the iGamingHub catalog name at least one aggregator they distribute through, and among those 50 the typical studio names four. The names are not spread evenly. Across 198 studio-to-aggregator mentions, four platforms take 123 of them, or 62%: SOFTSWISS appears on 39 studio cards, EveryMatrix on 33, Hub88 on 27 and Slotegrator on 24. Forty-five of the 50 studios that name anyone at all name at least one of those four, and ten name all four.

These are the aggregators a studio chooses to say it works with, collected from its own website, partner pages and integration announcements in September 2026. They aren't contract lists, and a studio with a quiet website isn't a studio without distribution. That gap is the point. An operator picking a game aggregator is buying a catalog, and the studios themselves have already voted, in public, on which catalogs they consider worth being in.

Who the studios name, and how often

The table counts, for each aggregator, how many of the 50 naming studios list it, and what share of those 50 that is. Only aggregators with a platform card in the catalog are linked.

Three things stand out.

The top of the list is a club, not a ranking. The most common pairing in the catalog is SOFTSWISS with EveryMatrix, named together by 29 studios. EveryMatrix with Hub88 and SOFTSWISS with Slotegrator follow at 23 each. A studio that names one of the big four almost always names another, and the ten studios that name all four include Evolution, Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, BGaming, Yggdrasil and Quickspin, which is a good part of the content an operator's lobby is built around. For those studios the aggregators aren't competing channels; they're parallel doors into different operator bases, and the studio keeps all of them open. Game aggregator comparison 2026 sets out what sits behind each door.

Below the top four, the lists split by region and by type. Pariplay and Relax Gaming skew towards the Nordic and UK-facing studios: Blueprint, Nolimit City, Push Gaming and Thunderkick all name Relax Gaming and none of them names Slotegrator or BetConstruct, while Play'n GO and Quickspin name Pariplay. Slotegrator and BetConstruct carry the studios that sell into Eastern Europe, CIS and emerging markets: Belatra, Spadegaming, TaDa, Kiron and Vivo Gaming name one or both, and of the six Nordic and UK studios above only Quickspin appears on either list. GR8 Tech's twelve mix live casino and crash suppliers, Evolution, Ezugi, Pragmatic Play Live, Spribe, Turbo Games and SmartSoft among them, with a short slot list, which matches a platform built for sportsbook operators who add casino content second. None of this is visible on an aggregator's own page, where every catalog is "10,000+ games from 200+ providers". It's visible only when you flip the question and ask what the studios say.

Studios that name one aggregator are naming a relationship, not a channel. Six studios list exactly one: Playson and Caleta Gaming name SOFTSWISS, Platipus names GR8 Tech, Swintt names SkillOnNet, PG Soft names Relax Gaming, and Relax Gaming names itself. In most of those cases the single name is a launch partner or an exclusive distribution deal announced as news, which the studio's site keeps and the rest of its distribution quietly outgrows. A single name on a studio site is the least informative data point in the set: it tells you who the studio talked about, not who it sells through.

What the 16 silent studios have in common

Sixteen of the 66 studios name no aggregator at all: Fugaso, Tom Horn Gaming, GameArt, Fantasma Games, GreenTube, Mascot Gaming, Booming Games, High 5 Games, Mancala Gaming, Popok Gaming, Gamzix, CT Gaming, Popiplay, Gamebeat, Aviatrix and Heronbyte. Four of them, Booming Games, Tom Horn Gaming, GameArt and Fugaso, are listed on SOFTSWISS's own public game-provider page. They are not undistributed. Their own sites just don't say so.

The silence tracks how much a studio publishes about itself in general, not how much distribution it has. Of the 50 studios that name an aggregator, 45 also document at least one licence; of the 16 that don't, 10 do. Thirty-one of the naming studios publish a founding year and a target market list; none of the silent ones publish either. A studio site with a partner page tends to have a licence page and an about page too, and one without the first tends to lack the others. The absence is a signal about the website, and it's worth reading as one: a studio that won't tell you where it's distributed on its own site will make you ask in the RFP, along with the licence question that the same 16 sites mostly leave open.

Two names are worth separating from the rest. GreenTube is Novomatic's digital arm and distributes through the group's own channels, so an empty aggregator list on its site says nothing about reach. High 5 Games sells largely into the US social and real-money market, where distribution runs through state-approved integrations rather than the aggregators on this list. Silence has different causes at different sizes, and the RFP question is the same either way.

What this means for operators

If you're choosing an aggregator, the studio side of the catalog is a cheaper check than the aggregator's own game count. The four platforms at the top of the table are the ones the tier-one studios treat as mandatory, and a lobby built on any of them will carry Evolution, Pragmatic Play, NetEnt and BGaming without a direct deal. Below the top four, match the aggregator to the market you're actually launching in: Pariplay or Relax for a UK or Nordic lobby, Slotegrator or BetConstruct for CIS, LatAm and Africa, GR8 Tech if the casino is an add-on to a sportsbook. Treat "200+ providers" on an aggregator's page as a claim to test against the twenty studios your players will recognise, not as a number to compare.

If you're a studio, the list is a benchmark. Four named aggregators is the catalog median and the number the biggest studios sit at or above. A studio naming one has a partner page that's out of date or a distribution strategy that isn't. Either way, the page is what an operator's procurement team reads first, and a site that names no aggregator, no licence and no founding year is a site that produces a longer RFP. Distribution doesn't move the licence question either: an aggregator carries the integration, not the supplier's own authorisation. In Great Britain a studio supplying licensed operators needs its own gambling software licence, and in Malta the equivalent is the Critical Gaming Supply licence; an aggregator's catalog is a channel into those markets, not a substitute for the permission to sell there.

Methodology and sources

Aggregator names are the ones each studio publishes on its own website, partner or integration pages, or press announcements, or has supplied for its iGamingHub catalog card, as recorded in September 2026 across all 66 game studios listed at that date. Each studio site was checked against a fixed list of twelve aggregator names that iGamingHub tracks; Pronet Gaming and FSB Technology are the two names recorded by hand outside that list. A studio counts as "naming" an aggregator when the name appears on its site or card, which captures announced and legacy relationships alike and is why a single name is treated as weak evidence. An empty list means none of the tracked names appeared, not that the studio has no distribution: at least four of the sixteen silent studios appear on an aggregator's own partner page. Licence, founding year and market figures come from the same cards, following the method in what suppliers document about licences. Shares are calculated against the 50 naming studios, not the full 66. Catalog data changes as studios update their sites; the linked studio and platform cards carry the current values.